Dealing with Adjoining Owners and Disputes

Strata Disputes – Under the Ground up in the Air and Everywhere in Between 

Strata disputes and common property come in all shapes and sizes, especially when dealing with neighbouring property owners.

As owners of real property, owners corporations find themselves dealing with the owners of neighbouring land in a multitude of circumstances.

Neighbouring Land Disputes

  • Easements
  • Ground Anchors
  • Cranes
  • Scaffolding
  • Trees, Fences and Walls
  • Law of Nuisance
  • Damage and Liability
  • And even, landslides

You’ve probably had reason to deal with one or more of the above – but if you haven’t, then get ready, because you almost certainly will at some point in time!

Read on… Common Property and Dealing with Adjoining Owners


DEALING WITH NEIGHBOURING PROPERTY – DO YOU NEED AN EASEMENT?


Warwick van Ede Strata Lawyer, Accredited Property Law Specialist, Litigator

Warwick van Ede I BEc LLM I Lawyer

Since 1990, Warwick has specialised in strata law, property law and litigation. Recognised for his expertise, he is also a NSW Law Society Accredited Specialist in Property Law. In 2021 he was selected to serve on the Property Law Committee of the Law Society of NSW. Profile I LinkedIn

Contact Us

 

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist. 




Is it Time to Review Your By-Laws Again? 

 

Do your strata by-laws keep pace with strata law changes?

In Nov 2016, every owners corporation was required to review its by-laws within 12 months.

Most owners corporations completed their by-law review by 2018.

Since then, there have been numerous changes to the laws affecting strata buildings.

Strata law changes affecting strata buildings

They include substantial changes to the laws regulating:

  • Short term rental accommodation arrangements – a by-law can now ban short term lettings in certain circumstances;
  • Pets – a by-law can no longer ban pets and by-laws that do are not enforceable;
  • Renovations – the Design and Building Practitioners Act 2020 now applies to many renovations – do your renovations by-laws require owners to comply with the Act?;
  • Fire Safety – news fire safety laws will be introduced to increase fire safety standards for strata buildings – do your by-laws allow your owners corporations to recover fire safety upgrade costs from owners?;
  • Sustainability Infrastructure – new strata laws relax the requirement for approval of sustainability infrastructure such as solar panels and electric vehicle charging stations;
  • Levy Recovery – there remains controversy about recovery of debt collection costs – do your by-laws allow these costs to be recorded in an owner’s ledger and recovered by the owners corporation?

Do your by-laws take into account these changes to the law?

If not, they might not be enforceable or they might simply be outdated.

So is it time to again review your by-laws? We have conducted 100’s of by-law reviews for owners corporations across NSW.


DO YOU NEED A REVIEW OF YOUR BY-LAWS?


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Can a Company be Appointed as a Proxy?

An owner is entitled to appoint a “person” to act as his or her proxy at a general meeting of an owners corporation.

But does that allow an owner to appoint a company as his or her proxy rather than an individual?  The answer might surprise you.

 Is it Possible for an Owner to Appoint a Company as their Proxy?

Owners in strata buildings regularly appoint other people to act as their proxies at general meetings of owners corporations.  Invariably, those proxies are individuals, often other lot owners.  But is it possible for an owner to appoint a company as his or her proxy to vote at a general meeting of an owners corporation?  If so, who is entitled to exercise voting rights on behalf of the company as proxy?  The answer lies in the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (Act) and other legislation.

An Analysis

An owner is entitled to appoint a “person” to act as his or her proxy at a general meeting: cl 23(3) and 26(1), Sch 1 of the Act.  However, the Act does not provide a definition of a “person”.  But it is clear that a person can be an individual or a company for several reasons.

First, the Interpretation Act 1987 says that in any Act “person” includes an individual or a company: section 3(3) and Sch 4.

Second, the expression “person” is used throughout the Act in a way that makes clear that it can include both an individual or a company.  For example:

  • section 7 expressly provides that a person can be a company for the purpose of determining whether a person is connected with another person;
  • section 10(2) prohibits an owners corporation delegating any of its functions to a person unless the delegation is specifically authorised by the Act and it is clear that a “person” in that context would include a strata managing agent which would typically be a company;
  • section 12 allows the owners corporation to employ any person that it thinks fit to assist it exercise its functions which includes a building manager which typically carries on business through a company;
  • section 22 requires a “person” who has an interest in a lot that gives the person a right to cast a vote either personally or by nominee at meetings of the owners corporation to give the owners corporation written notice of that interest – in that context, a “person” clearly includes a company which owns a lot which is able to cast a vote via a company nominee.

There are other indications from the language used in the Act that a person is not limited to an individual but can include a company.  For example:

  • The Act gives a co owner of a lot (which could be company) the right to vote at a general meeting in certain circumstances: cl 23(4) and (5) Sch 1;
  • An original owner (i.e. the developer) can cast a vote by means of a proxy in certain circumstances (and a developer is almost invariably a company): cl 25(5) and (6), Sch 1; and
  • A building manager or strata manager can vote as a proxy provided that their vote does not result in them obtaining a material benefit (and a building manager and strata manager are typically a company): cl 25(7), Sch 1.

Moreover, the expression “person” where used in legislation has repeatedly been interpreted by the Courts to mean both an individual and a company: see In the matter of Metal Storm Limited (in liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No. 2) [2019] NSWSC 1682.

There are other reasons why an owner can appoint a company as his or her proxy.  For example, a company can be appointed as an attorney under a power of attorney and the appointment of an attorney is similar to the appointment of a proxy given that in both cases a person is appointing another person or company to act as his or her agent.

And in sphere of company law, a shareholder can appoint a “person” as his or her proxy to vote at meetings of a company and it is clear that the person who is appointed as the proxy can be either an individual or a company: see section 249X of the Corporations Act 2001.

Finally, there is nothing in the Act which explicitly prohibits an owner appointing a company as his or her proxy.

Who Exercises Proxy Voting Rights?

Where an owner appoints a company as his or her proxy, the company itself cannot exercise voting rights as the proxy.  So who does?

Obviously, a company that is appointed as a proxy needs to appoint an individual to exercise the powers of the company as a proxy.  That would typically be done by a written notice given by the company to the owners corporation specifically empowering the individual to act on behalf of the company as proxy at meetings of the owners corporation.  Normally, that individual would be the company secretary or a director of the company.  But as long as the person is properly authorised by the company to exercise proxy voting rights on its behalf, and the owners corporation has notice of that authority, he or she may do so.

Conclusion

Whilst it is uncommon for an owner to appoint a company as his or her proxy, that situation can arise.  When it does, an individual with the authority of the company that the owners corporation has notice of is able to exercise the company’s proxy voting rights on behalf of the owner.


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Owners Corporation – NCAT Enforces By-laws

Does an owners corporation have to enforce its by-laws?  If an owners corporation decides to ignore breaches of its by-laws, can NCAT force the owners corporation to take action and enforce its by-laws?  A recent NCAT case provides the answer to these questions.

Introduction

Almost every strata building is governed by a set of by-laws. Those by-laws set out rules that regulate behaviour, noise, the keeping of pets and, among other things, the performance of renovations.  The by-laws are binding on the owners corporation and the owners and occupiers of the lots.  An owners corporation has the power to enforce the by-laws if they are breached.  For example, an owners corporation can issue an owner or occupier of a lot with a notice to comply with a by-law or apply to NCAT for an order to require the owner or occupier to obey a by-law.  But what happens when an owners corporation decides to turn a blind eye to a breach of a by-law committed by an owner?  Can the owners corporation be forced to enforce the by-law against the culprit?  If so, by whom?  A recent NCAT case reveals the answers to these questions.

The Case

Suzanne Lyon owns a lot in a residential strata scheme in Wollstonecraft, Sydney.  In August 2020, the owners corporation created a common property rights by-law to give the owner of the lot beneath Ms Lyon’s lot, Mr Swanson, the right to build a pergola over his rear courtyard.  Subsequently, Mr Swanson built the pergola, but Ms Lyon claimed that the pergola did not comply with the by-law because it was too high.  The by-law had permitted the pergola to be 2.7m above the concrete floor of the courtyard but it was built about 3.21m above that concrete floor.  Ms Lyon wanted the pergola to be removed or modified but the owners corporation was not prepared to force Mr Swanson to change the pergola.  For that reason, Ms Lyon sued the owners corporation in NCAT and sought orders to require the owners corporation to remove Mr Swanson’s pergola or enforce the common property rights by-law by requiring the pergola to comply with it.

The Outcome

Ms Lyon’s claim was partially successful.  NCAT agreed with Ms Lyon that the pergola was too high and was not built in accordance with the by-law.  NCAT then considered whether it had power to make an order to force the owners corporation to enforce the by-law and require Mr Swanson to comply with it by changing the height of the pergola.  NCAT concluded that it did have that power because it could make an order, on the request of an owner, to settle a complaint or dispute about the failure of an owners corporation to exercise its functions including its power to enforce a by-law.  NCAT held that there would be a sufficient basis to make an order where an owners corporation has a discretion to exercise a function (such as its discretionary power to enforce a by-law) but decides not to do so.  NCAT considered that there was little point in the strata legislation creating a mechanism for an owners corporation to pass a common property rights by-law merely to have that by-law flouted and for the owners corporation to fail to act in the face of complaints from other owners and legal advice it had received.  Ultimately, NCAT concluded that the owners corporation’s failure to manage Mr Swanson’s non compliance with the by-law, or to make any attempt to require him to comply with the by-law, meant that an order should be made requiring the owners corporation to exercise its functions to administer the strata scheme for the benefit of the owners and in accordance with the by-laws.

The Orders

For those reasons, NCAT ordered the owners corporation to take all necessary steps to require Mr Swanson to comply with the by-law by requiring him to reduce the height of the pergola to 2.7m above the concrete surface of his courtyard.  However, NCAT gave the owners corporation 6 months to comply with that order to allow Mr Swanson sufficient time to apply to the owners corporation for approval to amend the by-law to permit the pergola to remain at a height of 3.21m above the courtyard floor and for that amendment to the by-law to be approved by the owners corporation.

Analysis

This case is one of the first times that NCAT has made an order to compel an owners corporation to enforce its by-laws.  The decision does break new ground because it was previously thought that because the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 does not explicitly require an owners corporation to enforce its by-laws but rather gives an owners corporation a discretion to do so, it was not possible for NCAT to force an owners corporation to require owners and occupiers to comply with its by-laws.  The order made in the case begs the question: What does the owners corporation need to do to take “all necessary steps” to require an owner to comply with a by-law?  Does that require the owners corporation to issue a notice to comply with the by-law against the owner?  Or does it require the owners corporation to do more and, if necessary, take legal action against the owner to force him or her to comply with the by-law?  And what if the owners corporation is successful in that legal action, but the owner ignores orders that are made to require him or her to comply with the by-law?  What is the owners corporation required to do then?  It remains to be seen whether those questions will need to be answered by NCAT in the future.

Conclusion

The case sends a message that owners and occupiers of lots who are affected by breaches of the by-laws committed by other owners and occupiers are not helpless.  They can apply to NCAT for orders to force their owners corporation to enforce the by-laws against those in breach of them.  It remains to be seen whether the decision in Lyon v The Owners – Strata Plan No. 11045 [2023] NSWCATCD 31 will be followed in future cases.

/*! elementor - v3.14.0 - 26-06-2023 */
.elementor-widget-image{text-align:center}.elementor-widget-image a{display:inline-block}.elementor-widget-image a img[src$=".svg"]{width:48px}.elementor-widget-image img{vertical-align:middle;display:inline-block}


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Dealing with Fire Orders Affecting a Lot Property

Fire Orders and Cost Recovery By-laws

An owners corporation is only responsible for the common property in its strata scheme.  So how does an owners corporation deal with a fire order that requires it to do work to lot property?  Can a Council issue a fire order against an owners corporation to do work to lot property? If so, can the owners corporation make a by-law to recover from owners the costs it incurs doing fire safety work in their lots? The answers might surprise you.

Strata Law

An owners corporation is the owner of the common property it is strata scheme.  The owners corporation is responsible for managing and controlling the use of the common property and maintaining and repairing the common property.  Those obligations arise under the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (Strata Act).

An owners corporation does not own the lots in its strata scheme, and under that Act, the owners corporation has virtually no responsibility in relation to any of the lots.  This is because the lots are privately owned and the owners and occupiers of the lots are generally responsible for managing and maintaining them.  So, under the Strata Act, the owners corporation is generally not responsible for maintaining and repairing lot property.  Further, in general, the owners corporation is only able to adopt budgets and raise levies to cover expenses associated with the common property, not lot property

Fire Orders

But what happens when a Local Council issues a fire order that requires an owners corporation to carry out work to both common property and lot property.  Does the Council have power to issue that order? And does the owners corporation have power to comply with the order and do work that affects lot property?

Planning Laws

The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) gives a Local Council power to order the owner of premises to do things that are specified in the order in order the promote adequate fire safety in a building when provisions for fire safety in the building are inadequate to prevent, suppress or prevent the spread of fire.  The EPA Act says that premises include a building and that an owner includes, in the case of land that is the subject of a strata scheme, an owners corporation.  Therefore, the EPA Act gives a Local Council power to order an owners corporation to carry out work to improve fire safety to both common property and lot property.

Case Law

This was confirmed by the NSW Court of Appeal as long ago as 1985.  In 1985, the Court decided the case of Proprietors of Strata Plan 159 v Parramatta City Council.  In that case, the Council had issued a fire safety order to the owners corporation of a strata building which required the owners corporation to carry out fire safety upgrades principally in two lots which were to be used as a restaurant.  The owners corporation challenged the order and argued that the order unfairly burdened other owners with the costs of carrying out fire safety upgrades predominately to those two lots.  However, the Court concluded that the statutory language was clear in permitting a Council to issue a fire order against an owners corporation that required work to be done to lot property.  The Court acknowledged that this meant that sometimes the costs of complying with a fire order would be shared by all of the owners even when the need for fire safety upgrades was confined exclusively to the lots of some of the owners which may seem inequitable.

But the Court considered that there were two answers to this problem.  First, if the legislation clearly allowed a fire order to require an owners corporation to do work to lot property the mere fact that might produce a sense of injustice between owners was not a reason for the Court frustrating the clearly expressed intention of the legislature and it was a matter for the Parliament to change the legislation to overcome any unfairness if it saw fit to do so.  Second, fire is a phenomenon which endangers all owners and occupiers of lots meaning all owners have a common interest in fire prevention and fire safety.  This meant that it made sense for the legislation to allow the Council to issue one fire order against the owners corporation rather than have to issue and monitor compliance with multiple fire orders against numerous parties.  Ultimately, the Court considered that it was in the common interest of all owners for the Council to have the power to issue the fire order against the owners corporation.  The Court’s decision has recently been referred to with approval by NCAT.

Recovery of Costs

If a Council can require an owners corporation to carry out fire safety upgrades to lot property, can the owners corporation recover the cost of performing those upgrades from the relevant owners?  There is no clear answer to that question.  Many owners corporations have introduced cost recovery type by-laws that purport to allow them to recover costs from owners in a variety of circumstances.  There have been several recent cases in which NCAT has invalidated cost recovery type by-laws.  But there are also cases where NCAT has upheld cost recovery type by-laws. Ultimately, if an owners corporation wants to seek to recover from certain owners the costs it incurs carrying out fire safety upgrades in their lots, a cost recovery type by-law will need to be put in place but there may be difficulty enforcing the by-law.

Conclusion

A Council is entitled to issue a fire order against an owners corporation that requires fire safety upgrades to be carried out to lot property.  Where that occurs, the Strata Act gives the owners corporation the right to enter the lots in order the do the work required by the fire order.  If an owners corporation wants to recover the costs it incurs carrying out fire safety upgrades in a particular lot, a cost recovery type by-law will need to be put in place for that purpose.  However, NCAT has recently raised question marks over the validity of cost recovery type by-laws so the recovery of those costs cannot be guaranteed.


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Noisy Strata Neighbours – The Top Noise Complaints

Strata apartments come with many perks for owners and tenants but of course, there’s also a downside with one of the biggest complaints being noise. As more and more people enjoy apartment living noise complaints have increased in recent times by 33%* and they continue to rise.

What are top noise complaints in strata?

  • Barking dogs
  • Power tools
  • Loud music
  • Alarms
  • Construction/renovations
  • Vehicles
  • Wooden/tiled floors
  • Children

And… some of the more unusual complaints in more recent times include:

  • Tap dancing
  • Assembling IKEA furniture
  • Loud urinating at night is becoming one of the most common reasons for sleep-­deprived apartment dwellers
  • Late night showers

What if your strata by-law neglects to mention specific issues around noise?

A well written noise by-law can go much further than the model by-law and provide residents with guidelines and time restrictions for when they can and can’t make noise. It also lets neighbours know their rights if they feel the need to make a noise complaint.

Did you know if your noise by-laws are insufficient or lacking clarity on noise related matters our specialist team of strata lawyers can assist you in updating or developing your noise by-law.

*NSW Department of Fair Trading


DOES YOUR NOISE BY-LAW NEED TO BE REVIEWED?


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Councils call for Strict Caps on Short Term Letting

Short-term rental accommodation (STRA) in strata properties will continue to be a highly contentious topic in 2023 with even more scrutiny and increasing backlash to the industry because of the current housing crisis.

Since February 2023 there has been a significant rise in complaints about short term letting guests impacting strata blocks due to noisy parties, visitors coming and going, rubbish not being disposed of properly or at all and common property damage, among many other complaints.

Since 2021 the number of New South Wales properties listed as short-term rentals has surged by 42% with over 45,000 listed STRA properties, causing the State’s Planning Minister to review proposed annual caps later this year.

Councils Take Action to Regulate STRA

Many local councils are beginning to take action to regulate short-term letting in their areas introducing a raft of regulations for short-term letting with some councils increasing their council rates for property owners who short-term let for more than 60 days.

The Independent Planning Commission in early May 2023 advised that councils ‘should’ be allowed to impose a 60-day cap on short-term rentals after Byron Shire last year attempted to introduce a 90-day cap.

The NSW government is expecting 12 councils to call for strict caps on short-term rentals.

A decision is yet to be made regarding the capping of STRA properties however this trend is expected to continue in 2023, with more local councils introducing more controls to regulate the STRA letting sector.

STRA By-Law

In NSW, an owners corporation can introduce a by-law that restricts STRA. Many strata building have introduced STRA by-laws that prohibit unlawful STRA and regulate permissible STRA. Anecdotal evidence is that these by-laws have proven effective in reducing problems associated with STRA.

Is it time to review your Short Term Rental Accommodation (STRA) by-laws?


DOES YOUR STRA BY-LAW NEED TO BE REVIEWED? CLICK NOW!


Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Winter Chills in Strata Brings Increased Fire Risks

The NSW Department of Fair Trading have published information on the ‘fire safety regulations 2022′ with a fact sheet and FAQs explaining reforms in more detail. 

A timely reminder as the nights and days start to get cooler, winter will soon be here and as owners and tenants use heaters and other electrical items to warm apartments it increases the risk of fires in strata buildings as they choose to stay indoors and out of the cold.

What are the most common causes of fire?

According to Fire and Rescue NSW the most common causes of fires, especially in winter, are:

  • Faulty electric and gas heaters
  • Items placed too close to heaters
  • Children knocking over heaters
  • Portable outdoor heaters
  • Overloaded powerboards
  • Kitchen cooktops and appliances
  • Wheat bags kept in bed
  • Electric blankets
  • Smoking and candles
  • Electric bikes and scooters
  • Buildings at risk with flammable cladding

Is your building fire safe?

Now is the ideal time to ensure you are familiar and up to date with the fire safety requirements for your strata building and to ensure:

  • Your building has had its annual fire safety inspection by an accredited Fire Protection Association Australia (FPAA) inspector, and everything is in working order and in line with the NSW fire safety laws
  • Your annual fire safety statement, which is mandatory for most buildings, is lodged with the local council and Fire and Rescue NSW

How do you help ensure your building is fire safe?

A ‘Fire Safety By-law can help ensure all tenants and lot owners are fully aware of the fire safety requirements they must obey and to not do anything that create’s a fire safety risk. 

This type of by-Law can also make tenants and owners liable for false fire alarm call out fees or for any damage they cause to the building. 

A ‘Fire Safety By-Law’ can greatly enhance the fire safety of your building, reducing your fire risk.


DO YOU NEED A FIRE SAFETY BY-LAW? CLICK HERE NOW!


DOWNLOAD YOUR FIRE SAFETY FACT SHEET HERE.

Adrian Mueller Partner JS Mueller & Co Lawyers specialising in Strata Law

Adrian Mueller I BCOM LLB FACCAL I Partner

Since 2002 Adrian has specialised almost exclusively in the area of strata law. His knowledge of, and experience in strata law is second to none. He is the youngest person to have been admitted as a Fellow of the ACSL, the peak body for strata lawyers in Australia. Profile I Linked

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




The Importance of a Good Renovation By-law

Good renovation by-laws will protect all parties such as the owners corporation, the lot owner (and future owners) plus ensure any renovations to a lot, in particular structural, are safe for the building.

A good renovation by-law will outline items such as:

  • A clear statement of the authorised work
  • The time frame for completion
  • Setting out any conditions that must be met
  • All contractors details and their insurances
  • Development consents
  • Recording all works, including structural works
  • Conditions that the lot owner and their contractor/s must adhere to
  • How waste is to be dealt with
  • Hours of work to minimise noise and disturbance to neighbours and the building
  • Access and parking requirements to ensure minimal disturbance to other lot owners and common property areas
  • Who is responsible for any ongoing maintenance
  • Ensuring that all work complies with relevant standards and legislation such as the Building Code of Australia and the Design & Building Practitioners Act 2020
  • Any nuances and more!

 

Why is it important to ensure that renovation by-laws are thorough?

Apart from wanting the renovation to run smoothly, the type of by-law to be used will depend on the renovation that is being undertaken. For example:

  • Is the renovation a bathroom or kitchen renovation involving waterproofing or changes to floor coverings; and
  • do you need a cosmetic, minor or major renovations by-law?

The tighter the renovation by-law the less likely there will be issues however in the event of an issue a well written by-law will more than likely get things back on track, minimising any disputes. A badly written renovation by-law may only exacerbate the situation and cause unwanted delays and disputes and may even end up in NCAT.

 

Are you in need of a renovation by-law?

Our legal team has significant expertise developing renovation by-laws for strata, company, and community living.

  • We have been developing renovation by-laws for 40+ years.
  • We know whether you will require a by-law for renovations for owners corporation approval.
  • We guarantee within 7 days you will receive the right renovation by-law.
  • We also understand that you ‘may’ need your renovation by-law urgently for an upcoming strata meeting – just let us know, we will make it happen.


DO YOU NEED A RENOVATION BY-LAW? CLICK HERE NOW!

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.




Is the Retro Fitting of EV Chargers in Strata Unviable?

Under a plan by the City of Sydney  all new apartment blocks will need to provide EV chargers and existing apartment blocks will need to retrofit EV chargers as the Council pushes to drive the uptake of EV’s and drive net zero emissions by 2035.

Retro Fitting EV Chargers

Many older apartment blocks are struggling with the concept of installing EV chargers, a major hurdle for the following reasons:

  • The significant costs
  • Navigating the current building infrastructure
  • Questions about who pays for the new infrastructure?
  • Uncertainty over who pays for the electricity used?
  • Questions about how the EV owner is charged for electricity used and whether a by-law can introduce a user pays system for electricity costs
  • Lack of information about EV charger installation
  • Convincing lot owners who don’t own an EV (and may never) to contribute to the cost of installing EV charging infrastructure

The NSW Government’s promise in the upcoming elections to install 30,000 public charging stations across NSW is a positive move in the right direction.

However, in Europe more than 80% and in North America 70% of EV vehicles are charged in homes overnight.

So, perhaps the Government needs to further develop ways to assist with the uptake of retrofitting EV chargers in existing apartment blocks to ensure the City of Sydney (and other areas) reach their target of zero emissions by 2035.

In that regard, the NSW Treasurer recently announced that if the NSW Government is re-elected at the upcoming election, changes will be made to strata laws in NSW to make it easier to install EV Chargers in apartment buildings. The jury is still out on that announcement but it would be a step in the right direction.

For more information refer to these media articles:

Do You Need an Electric Vehicle (EV) By-law?

Our specialist team of strata lawyers has drafted many by-laws permitting owners to install electric vehicle chargers in strata buildings. Our EV by-law considers and covers all essentials including these key issues:

  • Who’s responsible for paying the cost of electricity used to charge electric vehicles
  • Any necessary upgrades to the electricity infrastructure in the building
  • Overloading the existing electrical infrastructure


DO YOU NEED ASSISTANCE WITH AN ELECTRIC VEHICLE BY-LAW?

Contact Us

For all strata law advice including by-laws, building defects and levy collections contact our specialist NSW and Sydney strata lawyers here or call 02 9562 1266, we’re happy to assist.